I ended utilizing HDMI, however it wasn’t by selection

HDMI and DisplayPort are two of the major players in the case of sign codecs. For TVs, HDMI is your solely possibility, however PC house owners have some selections to make. For years, I used HDMI, primarily as a result of it was the usual and I had a number of additional cables mendacity round. It wasn’t till I acquired extra into the weeds and began caring about greater resolutions and framerates that I found the world of DisplayPort.

It grew to become abundantly clear that GPU producers had been making an attempt to push me in the direction of DisplayPort as effectively, as a result of my 3070 Ti GPU has three DisplayPort ports with only a single HDMI 2.1 port. If I wished so as to add extra screens, I might should do it with a DisplayPort cable. Because it seems, that is not a foul factor, and I do not assume I will be going again to HDMI. HDMI 2.2’s release might definitely change that, however I am advantageous with DisplayPort in the meanwhile.

DisplayPort quietly grew to become the usual

HDMI was compelled out

DisplayPort tends to have a status within the PC gaming group as being superior to HDMI, however there’s extra to it than that. Utilizing my 3070 Ti for instance once more, it is geared up with three DisplayPort 1.4 ports, so it provides much less bandwidth than the one HDMI port included. Regardless of that, I am not utilizing the HDMI cable, however it’s not like I even had the choice within the first place.

I have been utilizing an HP X34 ultrawide monitor for a number of years now, and which means I now not use all of the ports on my GPU. Nevertheless, HP would not give me even an phantasm of selection, as the one port it has is a DisplayPort 1.4 slot. In relation to proudly owning a PC, it feels prefer it’s DisplayPort or nothing in numerous circumstances. My GPU may need an HDMI 2.1 slot, however I can not use it with if I wish to get essentially the most out of my construct.

My monitor is able to 1440p at 165 FPS in a 21:9 facet ratio, so whereas it is demanding, it isn’t pushing the super-high refresh charges or decision ceilings that different screens demand. I sometimes lock the framerate to 120 FPS, so I even go away efficiency on the desk after I play video games. This makes DisplayPort 1.4 completely advantageous for this use, and whereas I’ve a number of additional HDMI 2.1 cables mendacity round, I haven’t got any purpose to modify my cables or screens as a result of I do not assume I might see any enhancements with it, even when my monitor might take it. If my efficiency was struggling, then positive, I might look into altering issues, however I do not really feel the necessity to mess with something proper now.

It won’t really feel prefer it, however HDMI 2.1 was launched again in 2017, and its efficiency is healthier than DisplayPort 1.4. On paper, you’d assume that might imply individuals would transfer again to HDMI, however it hasn’t occurred. My monitor was launched years after HDMI 2.1, however it nonetheless caught with DisplayPort, regardless of it being the inferior format. I am not complaining as a result of it nonetheless works simply advantageous, however I believe it is fascinating to have a look at how prevalent HDMI is for TVs, however it’s the alternative for screens. In 2025, it is troublesome to get HDMI 2.1 running for lots of PC house owners.

HDMI 2.2 can flip the tides

The ebb and stream

HDMI Discussion board

Very like Intel dominating AMD CPUs till the discharge of the Ryzen line, DisplayPort’s time on the prime could also be coming to an finish with the discharge of HDMI 2.2. This new format guarantees speeds of up to 96 Gbps, surpassing DisplayPort 2.1’s 80 Gbps, so these searching for the perfect efficiency have fairly a bit to sit up for on the horizon.

From my standpoint, I nonetheless do not see a purpose to improve, particularly since nothing I exploit proper can benefit from HDMI 2.2 speeds. Because it slowly turns into the usual and a couple of.1 ports get upgraded to 2.2, I am going to give it one other look. I’ve requested myself what these speeds are for, as a result of I’ve a tricky time justifying it. I’ve a house theater setup in my front room full with a Dolby Atmos, so I profit from the additional bandwidth HDMI 2.1 offers with audio there. HDMI 2.2 will push these boundaries even additional, in order that’s excellent news for audiophiles.

For PC customers, the positive factors aren’t as clear. I do not want cutting-edge audio or visuals from my PC. I play World of Warcraft with removed from maxed out graphics, regardless of me having a Ryzen 7800x3D and 3070 Ti. These efficiency positive factors are largely misplaced on me, and I perceive that it is an odd stance to have, however that is why I do not worth these adjustments in format as a lot. Apart from G-Sync needing my DisplayPort cable, I am unsure if I might’ve even upgraded to HDMI 2.1 on my PC.

I like new know-how as a lot as the subsequent individual, however it’s tiring to see one thing new and glossy come round just for producers to take without end to make it really feel like an improve was even price it. The PS5 console technology had numerous its advertising push mentioning 4K 120 FPS gaming, and it made me exit and decide up a Sony Bravia X90J so I might get in on the motion. Because it seems, solely a choose few video games can push these boundaries, and hardly something is even native 4K 60 FPS.

These gradual adjustments have led me to stay with codecs like DisplayPort 1.4 longer than I anticipated. DisplayPort 2.1 got here out in 2022, however the RTX 4000 collection playing cards did not ship with it. Though the format was able to go, it wasn’t till 2025 {that a} new technology of Nvidia graphics playing cards adopted it. The great factor is that every one HDMI and DisplayPort cables are backwards appropriate, so you can also make an improve even when your {hardware} would not benefit from it but. I am not operating out to purchase an HDMI 2.2 cable simply but, however you are able to do that so that you could be ready for when GPUs begin using it — hopefully it would not take till 2028.